US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a “Security Risk” from FCC Certification Testing




On 22 May 2025 (local time), the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) unanimously (4–0) adopted new rules aimed at preventing so-called “China and other untrustworthy actors” from controlling the testing and certification of wireless devices for the US. The core of the new rules: all laboratories and bodies involved in testing, reviewing and certifying US telecommunications equipment (TCBs, Telecommunication Certification Bodies) must not have ownership ties that could pose national security risks, in particular the potential risk of being controlled by “foreign adversaries”.

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 1

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 2

Background and scope of the new rules

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 3
  • The current certification system: under FCC rules, all electronic devices that emit radio frequency energy (such as IoT devices, smartphones and network equipment) must pass compliance testing by private test laboratories or certification bodies (TCBs) before entering the US market. About 75% of electronics imported into the US currently rely on Chinese laboratories for testing.

  • A shift in regulatory logic: previously, accreditation of these bodies focused on technical competence; the new rules for the first time make “trustworthiness” (especially ties to foreign governments or entities) a core assessment criterion.

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 4

US “national security” allegations and past measures

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 5
  • Basis of the allegations: the FCC claims that some Chinese laboratories are linked to state-owned enterprises, military-civil fusion institutions or the government, and could open gaps in US telecommunications infrastructure for “hostile forces” through device testing. For example, some laboratories have tested thousands of devices entering the US market.

  • Past cases: in recent years the FCC has repeatedly restricted Chinese companies on “national security” grounds – for example, in November 2022 it added Huawei, ZTE, Hikvision and others to the “Covered List”, banning their telecommunications equipment and video surveillance products from the US market.

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 6

Enforcement criteria and further measures

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 7
  • Compliance threshold: the new rules require laboratories and certification bodies to be recognised by the FCC, with reviews based on official US government security lists (such as the Department of Defense list of Chinese military companies and the Department of Commerce Entity List).

  • Next steps: the FCC is also advancing two proposals:

  1. Extending the testing ban to all laboratories in China and other “foreign adversary” countries;

  2. Requiring entities with significant ties to China or other adversaries to disclose all FCC licences and authorisations they hold.

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 8

Statement by the FCC Chairman

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 9

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr stressed: “Laboratories are the ‘gatekeepers’ of US telecommunications infrastructure. If testing is carried out by untrustworthy bodies or those controlled by foreign adversaries, insecure devices could enter the market and threaten national security.”

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 10

Conclusion: the new rules are seen as another step in US technological “decoupling” from China and are expected to have a far-reaching impact on China–US trade in electronic equipment and on global supply chains. Chinese companies and testing bodies concerned should follow policy developments closely and plan their compliance responses in advance.

More articles:

NMPA Announcement on Implementing the 2025 Edition of the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China

The Free Sale Certificate (FSC): A “Passport” for Global Medical Device Trade

The “Invisible Guardian” of EU Medical Device Registration: A Complete Guide to Authorized Representatives

A Special Route for E-Cigarettes to Enter the EU Outside the TPD

Introduction to EU MDR Class I Products

US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 11

About Us

COMPANY INTRODUCTION
EVERBIZ Certification Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (EVERBIZ) is a professional compliance service platform for testing, certification, consulting and training of medical products, dedicated to helping leading medical R&D companies at home and abroad improve their compliance capabilities and competitiveness. The company has offices and branches in Shanghai (China), Hong Kong, Munich (Germany), Salzburg (Austria) and Thailand, covering nearly 25 industries of compliance products (such as medical devices, new energy, household appliances, lighting, tools, laboratory instruments, machinery, in vitro diagnostics, wireless products and reagents).
US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 12

Our Offices

COMPANY  ADDRESS
Shanghai: Room 705, Building 6, Lane 111, Luxiang Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai | Germany: Landsberger Str. 155, 80687 München, Germany
Austria: Innsbrucker Bundesstraße 136/3, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
Hong Kong: Room A1, 11/F Winner Building, 36 Man Yue Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand: No. 850 Soi Lat Krabang 30/5, Lat Krabang Subdistrict, Bangkok 10520
US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 13
US Bans Chinese Laboratories Deemed a "Security Risk" from FCC Certification Testing – Figure 14




Scroll to Top