The Interplay Between the MDR/IVDR and the AI Act (AIA)

In June 2025 the EU Artificial Intelligence Board (AIB) and the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) jointly published the guidance document “Frequently Asked Questions on the Interplay between the MDR/IVDR and the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA)”, reference AIB 2025-1/MDCG 2025-6.
  • It is the EU’s first official guidance that systematically coordinates the sector-specific medical device regulations with the horizontal AI Act.
  • It provides a unified practical basis for the regulation and compliance review of AI medical devices.
  • It is the core compliance handbook for manufacturers of all AI medical devices and MDAI (medical device AI software) placed on the EU market, addressing the key industry pain points of dual regulation under the MDR/IVDR and the AIA: conflicting compliance requirements, ambiguous interpretations and overlapping procedures.

Download the guidance AIB 2025-1/MDCG 2025-6 at: https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/new-regulations/guidance-mdcg-endorsed-documents-and-other-guidance_en
The guidance has 7 chapters with 36 Q&A-style entries. Its main purpose is to fill the current gap in concrete technical specifications telling manufacturers exactly what to do.

1. Criteria in the guidance for identifying high-risk AI systems:

  • The horizontal, general risk-classification framework for AI systems and the sector-specific statutory classification system for medical devices under the EU MDR/IVDR are two regulatory systems whose legislative purposes, scope, classification rules and legal effect are completely independent. They only intersect in the case of medical AI (MDAI); neither replaces nor contains the other.
  • AI systems are classified in four tiers: minimal risk, limited risk, high risk and prohibited.
  • An MDAI is considered a high-risk AI system only if both of the following conditions are met: (1) the MDAI is a safety component, or the AI system is itself a medical device; and (2) a notified body must be involved in the conformity assessment. The table below gives a non-exhaustive overview of how Article 6(1) of the AIA applies under the MDR/IVDR:

Notably, the AIA’s high-risk classification does not affect the MDR/IVDR risk class; on the contrary, the MDR/IVDR classification determines whether an AI system falls into the AIA’s high-risk category.

2. Core compliance requirement modules

3. Compliance recommendations

  • Parallel application, complementary not conflicting: MDAI must comply with both the MDR/IVDR and the AIA.
  • Integrated compliance: documentation, processes and testing may be combined to reduce the burden.
  • Risk-based: all requirements are proportionate to the risk level of the device / AI system.
  • Dynamic adaptation: watch for upcoming EU technical guidance (e.g. on data governance and detailed rules on substantial modifications) and plan the compliance path for algorithm updates in advance.

Conclusion

This guidance makes EU regulation of medical AI more systematic, sets a reference benchmark for regulatory coordination in this field worldwide, and supports compliant innovation in the industry.

EVERBIZ is happy to share medical device expertise with industry clients, and hopes our extensive practical experience in quality systems and product registration will be helpful.

Let’s contribute together to the development of the medical device industry – if you have any questions or needs, please contact us.

More articles:
Introduction to EU AI Medical Device Compliance
Medical Device Software Terminology in the EU and US Explained
Similarities and Differences Between the GDPR and the EU Data Act
A Data Protection Impact Assessment Template for EU Medical Device GDPR
Regulations on Clinical Trial Design for AI-Assisted Detection Products in the EU
EVERBIZ Certification Services (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (EVERBIZ) is a professional compliance service platform for testing, certification, consulting and training of medical products, dedicated to helping leading medical R&D companies at home and abroad improve their compliance capabilities and competitiveness. The company has offices and branches in Shanghai (China), Hong Kong, Munich (Germany), Salzburg (Austria) and Thailand, covering nearly 25 industries of compliance products (such as medical devices, new energy, household appliances, lighting, tools, laboratory instruments, machinery, in vitro diagnostics, wireless products and reagents).
Shanghai: Room 909, Building 1, Lane 111 Luxiang Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai, China; Germany: Landsberger Str. 155, 80687 München, Germany
Austria: Innsbrucker Bundesstraße 136/3, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
Hong Kong: Room A1, 11/F Winner Building, 36 Man Yue Street, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand: No. 850 Soi Lat Krabang 30/5, Lat Krabang Subdistrict, Bangkok 10520

Scroll to Top